Fracture. Osteoporos Int. 2005;16(1):78?5. 9. Ikeda Y, Sudo A, Yamada T, Uchida A. Mortality following vertebral fractures within a Japanese IDO1 medchemexpress population. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2010;18(two): 148?52. ten. Jinbayashi H, Aoyagi K, Ross PD, Ito M, Shindo H, Takemoto T. Prevalence of vertebral deformity and its associations with physical impairment amongst Japanese women: the Hizen-Oshima Study. Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(9):723?30. 11. Miyakoshi N, Hongo M, Maekawa S, Ishikawa Y, Shimada Y, Itoi E. Back extensor strength and lumbar spinal mobility are predictors of top quality of life in individuals with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2007;18(10):1397?403. 12. Miyakoshi N, Itoi E, Kobayashi M, Kodama H. Influence of postural deformities and spinal mobility on quality of life in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2003;14(12):1007?012. 13. Suzuki N, Ogikubo O, Hansson T. Earlier vertebral compression fractures add for the deterioration from the disability and high-quality of life just after an acute compression fracture. Eur Spine J. 2010;19(four):567?74. 14. Takahashi T, Ishida K, Hirose D, et al. Trunk deformity is associated with a reduction in outside activities of every day living and life satisfaction in community-dwelling older folks. Osteoporos Int. 2005; 16(three):273?79. 15. Fujiwara S, Kasagi F, Masunari N, Naito K, Suzuki G, Fukunaga M. Fracture prediction from bone mineral density in Japanese males and females. J Bone Miner Res. 2003;18(8):1547?553. 16. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, et al. Incidence of vertebral fracture in Europe: outcomes from the European Potential Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(4):716?24. 17. Van der Klift M, De Laet CE, McCloskey EV, Hofman A, Pols HA. The incidence of vertebral fractures in guys and ladies: the Rotterdam Study. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(six):1051?056.
62.4 million Indians had been reported to possess form two diabetes mellitus (T2DM) putting India on the forefront of diabetic epidemic across globe.[1,2] Fear of hypoglycaemia and gain in body weight are barriers for initiation of insulin therapy.[3] Modern day insulin analogues are a easy new strategy or tool to glycaemic manage, associated with low variety of hypoglycaemia and favourable weight change.[4] A1chieve, a multinational, 24-week, non-interventional study, assessed the safety and effectiveness of insulin analogues in peopleAccess this article online Rapid Response Code: Website: ijem.in DOI: ten.4103/2230-8210.with T2DM (n = 66,726) in routine clinical care.[5] This brief communication presents the results for patients PI3K web enrolled from Karnataka, India.MATERIALSANDMETHODSPlease refer to editorial titled: The A1chieve study: Mapping the Ibn Battuta trailRESULTSA total of 2243 individuals were enrolled in the study. The patient traits for the whole cohort divided as insulin-na e and insulin users is shown in Table 1. Glycaemic control at baseline was poor in this population. The majority of sufferers (82.7 ) started on or switched to biphasic insulin aspart. Other groups have been insulin detemir (n = 211), insulin aspart (n = 111), basal insulin plus insulin aspart (n = 16) and also other insulin combinations (n = 40).Corresponding Author: Dr. Raman Shetty, Novo Nordisk India Pvt. Ltd., Plot No.32, 47 – 50, EPIP Area, Whitefield, Bangalore, India. E-mail: rasy@novonordiskSIndian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism / 2013 / Vol 17 / SupplementDeshpande, et al.: A1chieve study practical experience from Karnataka, India.
