Share this post on:

M: N Age months (imply) MA imply . monthsDawson and Galpert,Autism: N Age years DL High,LowTiegerman and Primavera,Autism: N Age years Low DLTiegerman and Primavera,May perhaps Volume ArticleAutism: N Age years Low DLBeing Imitated in ASDTABLE Continued NTypeLength of session SF session min SF modified paradigm: four phases SF: 1st stillface IP: Imitation phase SF: Second stillface PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26581242 SP: Spontaneous play phase Unfamiliar experimenter SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was different in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Social Focus (hunting at adult’s face) Motor activity and stereotypies Social responsiveness (silence,touching,distance from adult) Social consideration (seeking at a person) Social responsiveness (good facial expressions,unfavorable facial expressions,social gestures,close proximity,touch). The frequency of searching at an individual,negative facial expressions,social gestures,close proximity,and touch behaviors was significantly higher in SF than in SF immediately after the imitation phase Form of experimental process and familiarity of imitative partner Target behaviors ResultsContaldo et al.ParticipantsNadel et alAutism: N Age preschooler Low DLFrontiers in Psychology www.frontiersin.org SF session min The frequency of motor activity was reduce as well as the frequency of touching behavior was higher in SF vs. SF inside the Imitation group. A reduction in distance from the adult was observed in each groups. A reduce in silence (or improve in sounds) was observed in the Contingent group. The frequency of seeking at adult was higher in SF vs. SF only in the Contingent group. No impact on stereotypies. SF sessions min SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was unique in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Social attention (searching at adult) Social responsiveness (vocalizingsmiling,being closetouching adult,engaging in reciprocal play) buy 5-L-Valine angiotensin II Autistic behaviors (stereotypies,playing alone,inactivity) Object play behavior Imitation recognition The frequency of hunting,vocalizingsmiling,touching,and engaging in reciprocal play elevated from pre to post intervention extra inside the Imitation than within the Contingent group. A reduction in Autistic behaviors (playing alone and inactivity),an increase in Object play behavior and in imitation recognition had been observed from pre to postintervention more in the Imitation than in Contingent Situation group. Social attention (searching at adult) Novel object play behaviors Imitation skill Youngsters within the Imitation group vs. those within the Contingent group showed larger frequency of hunting and novel object play behaviors for the duration of the imitation phase. Young children in the Imitation group showed greater frequency of hunting and imitation behaviors than these inside the contingent group in the SP phase. Social attention and responsiveness (Touch,Appear and Request) Imitation talent SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was distinct in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimenter Important raise in Social behaviors from SF to SF for children inside the Imitation Situation group,but not for youngsters inside the Contingent Situation group. A important improve in Social behaviors was also discovered within the SP phase after the second session. (Continued) SF sessions min SF modified paradigm: see above The second phase was various in two groups (imitative or contingently responsive) Unfamiliar experimente.

Share this post on: