Using a position-weight matrix defining ERRa binding sites as described elsewhere

Using a position-weight matrix defining ERRa binding sites as described elsewhere [17]. The transcription-factor binding site representations were considered statistically significant at 5 risk after simultaneous comparison with a set of 100 human promoters.siRNATo knock down ERRa expression in FTC-133 cells, we transfected predesigned ERRa siRNAs (s4830) and scrambled control siRNA (AM4635) with siPORT NeoFX. After 48 h, cells were harvested for assays. All cells were tested for the downexpression of ERRa, and siRNA was considered efficient when the ERRa expression was inhibited by at least 70 compared to scramble control.ERRa Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)ERRa-ChIP assays were performed on 106 XTC.UC1 cells/ assay using an anti-human ERRa antibody (sc-65714 from Santa Cruz, CA, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (EZ-ChIP, Upstate, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A rabbit anti-goat IgG (55335, MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) wasERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationItacitinib chemical information Figure 1. Metabolic analysis for the three cell lines: FTC-133, XTC.UC1, RO82W-1, and 30 thyroid Eledoisin site tissues (10 controls, 10 follicular tumors and 10 oncocytic tumors). Relative expression levels of LDHA, LDHB and ERRa determined by quantitative PCR and normalized to b-globin for cell lines (A) and thyroid tissues (B). Ratio of expression level of LDHA to LDHB for cell lines relative to FTC-133 (C) and for thyroid tissues relative to control tissues (D); Ratio of LDH to CS activities for cell lines (E) and thyroid tissues (F); Measurement of oxygen consumption under basal respiratory conditions for cell lines (G) and thyroid tissues (H). Results are the mean values6SD of three experiments for the cell lines and mean values of thyroid tumors relative to control thyroid tissues. p,0.05 for FTC-133 versus XTC.UC1 or RO82W-1, p,0.05 for XTC.UC1 versus RO82W-1, m p,0.05 for control thyroid versus follicular tumors or oncocytic tumors; D p,0.05 for follicular tumors versus oncocytic tumors. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058683.gWestern BlotCells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized and 50-14-6 Alprenolol site supplier collected in centrifuge tubes. Proteins (20mg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham International plc, Little Chalfont, UK) by electroblotting. The membranes were incubated in 5 non-fat milk in TBSTween (tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.1 Tween-20). The membranes were incubated overnight with dilutions (1/2000) of the following antibodies: monoclonal anti- b-Actin, anti-LDHA, anti-LDHB and anti-ERRa (all obtained from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After several washes in TBS-Tween, the membranes were incubated with an appropriate chemiluminescent-labelled horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, WestGrove, PA, USA). The blots were de-veloped using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECLplus, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). Signal quantification was performed by non-saturating picture scanning by a gel Doc 1000 Molecular Analyst apparatus (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).Quantitative RT-PCR AnalysesTotal RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for cultured cells, and trizol procedure for thyroid tissues (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 mg of RNA with Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.Figure 2. Potential ERRa re.Using a position-weight matrix defining ERRa binding sites as described elsewhere [17]. The transcription-factor binding site representations were considered statistically significant at 5 risk after simultaneous comparison with a set of 100 human promoters.siRNATo knock down ERRa expression in FTC-133 cells, we transfected predesigned ERRa siRNAs (s4830) and scrambled control siRNA (AM4635) with siPORT NeoFX. After 48 h, cells were harvested for assays. All cells were tested for the downexpression of ERRa, and siRNA was considered efficient when the ERRa expression was inhibited by at least 70 compared to scramble control.ERRa Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)ERRa-ChIP assays were performed on 106 XTC.UC1 cells/ assay using an anti-human ERRa antibody (sc-65714 from Santa Cruz, CA, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (EZ-ChIP, Upstate, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A rabbit anti-goat IgG (55335, MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) wasERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationFigure 1. Metabolic analysis for the three cell lines: FTC-133, XTC.UC1, RO82W-1, and 30 thyroid tissues (10 controls, 10 follicular tumors and 10 oncocytic tumors). Relative expression levels of LDHA, LDHB and ERRa determined by quantitative PCR and normalized to b-globin for cell lines (A) and thyroid tissues (B). Ratio of expression level of LDHA to LDHB for cell lines relative to FTC-133 (C) and for thyroid tissues relative to control tissues (D); Ratio of LDH to CS activities for cell lines (E) and thyroid tissues (F); Measurement of oxygen consumption under basal respiratory conditions for cell lines (G) and thyroid tissues (H). Results are the mean values6SD of three experiments for the cell lines and mean values of thyroid tumors relative to control thyroid tissues. p,0.05 for FTC-133 versus XTC.UC1 or RO82W-1, p,0.05 for XTC.UC1 versus RO82W-1, m p,0.05 for control thyroid versus follicular tumors or oncocytic tumors; D p,0.05 for follicular tumors versus oncocytic tumors. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058683.gWestern BlotCells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized and collected in centrifuge tubes. Proteins (20mg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham International plc, Little Chalfont, UK) by electroblotting. The membranes were incubated in 5 non-fat milk in TBSTween (tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.1 Tween-20). The membranes were incubated overnight with dilutions (1/2000) of the following antibodies: monoclonal anti- b-Actin, anti-LDHA, anti-LDHB and anti-ERRa (all obtained from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After several washes in TBS-Tween, the membranes were incubated with an appropriate chemiluminescent-labelled horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, WestGrove, PA, USA). The blots were de-veloped using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECLplus, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). Signal quantification was performed by non-saturating picture scanning by a gel Doc 1000 Molecular Analyst apparatus (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).Quantitative RT-PCR AnalysesTotal RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for cultured cells, and trizol procedure for thyroid tissues (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 mg of RNA with Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.Figure 2. Potential ERRa re.Using a position-weight matrix defining ERRa binding sites as described elsewhere [17]. The transcription-factor binding site representations were considered statistically significant at 5 risk after simultaneous comparison with a set of 100 human promoters.siRNATo knock down ERRa expression in FTC-133 cells, we transfected predesigned ERRa siRNAs (s4830) and scrambled control siRNA (AM4635) with siPORT NeoFX. After 48 h, cells were harvested for assays. All cells were tested for the downexpression of ERRa, and siRNA was considered efficient when the ERRa expression was inhibited by at least 70 compared to scramble control.ERRa Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)ERRa-ChIP assays were performed on 106 XTC.UC1 cells/ assay using an anti-human ERRa antibody (sc-65714 from Santa Cruz, CA, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (EZ-ChIP, Upstate, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A rabbit anti-goat IgG (55335, MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) wasERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationFigure 1. Metabolic analysis for the three cell lines: FTC-133, XTC.UC1, RO82W-1, and 30 thyroid tissues (10 controls, 10 follicular tumors and 10 oncocytic tumors). Relative expression levels of LDHA, LDHB and ERRa determined by quantitative PCR and normalized to b-globin for cell lines (A) and thyroid tissues (B). Ratio of expression level of LDHA to LDHB for cell lines relative to FTC-133 (C) and for thyroid tissues relative to control tissues (D); Ratio of LDH to CS activities for cell lines (E) and thyroid tissues (F); Measurement of oxygen consumption under basal respiratory conditions for cell lines (G) and thyroid tissues (H). Results are the mean values6SD of three experiments for the cell lines and mean values of thyroid tumors relative to control thyroid tissues. p,0.05 for FTC-133 versus XTC.UC1 or RO82W-1, p,0.05 for XTC.UC1 versus RO82W-1, m p,0.05 for control thyroid versus follicular tumors or oncocytic tumors; D p,0.05 for follicular tumors versus oncocytic tumors. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058683.gWestern BlotCells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized and collected in centrifuge tubes. Proteins (20mg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham International plc, Little Chalfont, UK) by electroblotting. The membranes were incubated in 5 non-fat milk in TBSTween (tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.1 Tween-20). The membranes were incubated overnight with dilutions (1/2000) of the following antibodies: monoclonal anti- b-Actin, anti-LDHA, anti-LDHB and anti-ERRa (all obtained from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After several washes in TBS-Tween, the membranes were incubated with an appropriate chemiluminescent-labelled horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, WestGrove, PA, USA). The blots were de-veloped using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECLplus, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). Signal quantification was performed by non-saturating picture scanning by a gel Doc 1000 Molecular Analyst apparatus (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).Quantitative RT-PCR AnalysesTotal RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for cultured cells, and trizol procedure for thyroid tissues (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 mg of RNA with Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.Figure 2. Potential ERRa re.Using a position-weight matrix defining ERRa binding sites as described elsewhere [17]. The transcription-factor binding site representations were considered statistically significant at 5 risk after simultaneous comparison with a set of 100 human promoters.siRNATo knock down ERRa expression in FTC-133 cells, we transfected predesigned ERRa siRNAs (s4830) and scrambled control siRNA (AM4635) with siPORT NeoFX. After 48 h, cells were harvested for assays. All cells were tested for the downexpression of ERRa, and siRNA was considered efficient when the ERRa expression was inhibited by at least 70 compared to scramble control.ERRa Chromatin Immunoprecipitation (ChIP)ERRa-ChIP assays were performed on 106 XTC.UC1 cells/ assay using an anti-human ERRa antibody (sc-65714 from Santa Cruz, CA, USA) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer (EZ-ChIP, Upstate, Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A rabbit anti-goat IgG (55335, MP Biomedicals, CA, USA) wasERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationERRa and Lactate Deshydrogenase B RegulationFigure 1. Metabolic analysis for the three cell lines: FTC-133, XTC.UC1, RO82W-1, and 30 thyroid tissues (10 controls, 10 follicular tumors and 10 oncocytic tumors). Relative expression levels of LDHA, LDHB and ERRa determined by quantitative PCR and normalized to b-globin for cell lines (A) and thyroid tissues (B). Ratio of expression level of LDHA to LDHB for cell lines relative to FTC-133 (C) and for thyroid tissues relative to control tissues (D); Ratio of LDH to CS activities for cell lines (E) and thyroid tissues (F); Measurement of oxygen consumption under basal respiratory conditions for cell lines (G) and thyroid tissues (H). Results are the mean values6SD of three experiments for the cell lines and mean values of thyroid tumors relative to control thyroid tissues. p,0.05 for FTC-133 versus XTC.UC1 or RO82W-1, p,0.05 for XTC.UC1 versus RO82W-1, m p,0.05 for control thyroid versus follicular tumors or oncocytic tumors; D p,0.05 for follicular tumors versus oncocytic tumors. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058683.gWestern BlotCells were rinsed in PBS, trypsinized and collected in centrifuge tubes. Proteins (20mg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Hybond-P, Amersham International plc, Little Chalfont, UK) by electroblotting. The membranes were incubated in 5 non-fat milk in TBSTween (tris-buffered saline (TBS) with 0.1 Tween-20). The membranes were incubated overnight with dilutions (1/2000) of the following antibodies: monoclonal anti- b-Actin, anti-LDHA, anti-LDHB and anti-ERRa (all obtained from Abcam, Cambridge, UK). After several washes in TBS-Tween, the membranes were incubated with an appropriate chemiluminescent-labelled horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Jackson ImmunoResearch, WestGrove, PA, USA). The blots were de-veloped using the enhanced chemiluminescence method (ECLplus, Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK). Signal quantification was performed by non-saturating picture scanning by a gel Doc 1000 Molecular Analyst apparatus (Biorad, Hercules, CA, USA).Quantitative RT-PCR AnalysesTotal RNA was isolated using the RNeasy kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) for cultured cells, and trizol procedure for thyroid tissues (Invitrogen). Reverse transcription was performed on 1 mg of RNA with Advantage RT-for-PCR kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA) following the manufacturer’s recommendations.Figure 2. Potential ERRa re.

Leave a Reply